City of Rutland v. McDonald's Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to appeal ZBA’s decision by the exclusive remedy of direct appeal precludes party from later challenging inadequacy of findings of fact
• holding that inadequate findings in a decision does not mean that a zoning board has failed to act for purposes of deemed approval
• holding the aggrieved party must timely appeal decisions based on deficient findings
• holding the aggrieved party must timely appeal decisions based on deficient findings
• noting tax appeal statute’s one year deterrent remedy
• construing 24 V.S.A. § 4470(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).