D.C. Circuit· 12/19/1997
In Re: Sealed Case
Citations
- 131 F.3d 208
- 327 U.S. App. D.C. 358
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 35680
- 1997 WL 777546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In the ordinary case, the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, at the very core of the executive function, has long been held presumptively unreviewable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Randolph, Garland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Alejandro Ceja-PradoNinth Circuit· 2003-06-25· cited 81×
- Secretary of Labor v. Twentymile Coal Co.D.C. Circuit· 2006-07-07· cited 76×
- Tamiami Partners, Ltd. Ex Rel. Tamiami Development Corp. v. Miccosukee Tribe of IndiansEleventh Circuit· 1999-06-07· cited 73×
- APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co., LPDistrict of Columbia· 2003-12-17· cited 46×
- United States v. SmithFirst Circuit· 1999-05-17· cited 21×
- United States v. John DoeSixth Circuit· 2000-09-13· cited 18×
- United States v. T.M.Fourth Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 16×
- United States v. Vargas-De-JesusFirst Circuit· 2010-08-30· cited 11×
- United States v. DigginsFirst Circuit· 2022-06-08· cited 11×
- United States v. F.S.J., a JuvenileNinth Circuit· 2001-09-06· cited 10×
- APCC Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia· 2003-12-17· cited 9×
- United States v. Andujar-AriasFirst Circuit· 2007-11-19· cited 8×
- West v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2015-02-09· cited 6×
- Michael Huerta v. Jody DucoteD.C. Circuit· 2015-06-30· cited 5×
- United States v. Y.A.District of Columbia· 2013-02-11· cited 4×
- Al Bahlul v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act· 2019-03-21· cited 4×
- Tamiami Partners v. MiccosukeeEleventh Circuit· 1999-06-07· cited 1×
- United States v. Diaz-AntunuezDistrict of Columbia· 2013-03-15· cited 1×
- No. 98-1807First Circuit· 1999-05-17
- In Re Jose C.California Court of Appeal· 2007-10-01
Cites
46 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court· 1949-06-20· cited 10,863×
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-02-26· cited 2,668×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 2,256×
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court· 1990-01-10· cited 2,054×
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court· 1996-05-13· cited 1,801×
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 1,692×
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court· 1995-03-01· cited 1,403×
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court· 1884-04-21· cited 1,249×
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 910×
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court· 1978-05-01· cited 806×
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court· 1971-05-24· cited 639×
- Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court· 1995-06-14· cited 571×
- Town of Newton v. RumerySupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 427×
- United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 368×
- United States v. Alex Wong, Roger Kwok, Chen I. Chung, Tung Tran, Danny Ngo, Brian Chan, Joseph Wang, Chiang T. Cheng, and Steven NgSecond Circuit· 1994-11-08· cited 230×
- Tara Ann Jungquist v. Sheikh Sultan Bin Khalifa Al NahyanD.C. Circuit· 1997-08-12· cited 184×
- United States v. ChambersSixth Circuit· 1991-09-10· cited 149×
- I. D. P. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-10-14· cited 103×
- United States v. William C. SorrenFirst Circuit· 1979-09-04· cited 98×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.