Supreme Court· 5/24/1971

United States v. Ryan

Citations

402 U.S. 530
91 S. Ct. 1580
29 L. Ed. 2d 85
1971 U.S. LEXIS 150
27 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that legal challenges to subpoena become ripe for appellate review only after contempt proceedings brought for refusal to comply
holding that legal challenges to subpoena become ripe for appellate review only after contempt proceedings brought for refusal to comply
holding that a subpoena is not appealable under Section 1292(a)(1)
finding that “review is available immediately of a denial of a motion for return of seized property, where there is no criminal prosecution pending against the movant”
holding that the respondent may refuse to comply with an order for production before a grand jury and litigate those issues if contempt or similar proceedings are brought against him; if his contentions are rejected by the trial court, they will only then be ripe for appellate review
distinguishing the situation in Walker from a collateral challenge in contempt proceedings of an erroneously issued subpoena duces tecum

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brennan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

483 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Ryan

53 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.