United States v. Vargas-De-Jesus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when the government did not articulate a defense of a conviction until oral argument, the appellate court “would be justified in treating the failure to brief the issue as a waiver”
• affirming conspiracy conviction despite lack of jury instruction under plain error standard of review, because evidence was sufficient
• affirming conspiracy conviction despite lack of jury instruction under plain error standard of review, because evidence was sufficient
• affirming conspiracy conviction despite lack of jury instruction under plain error standard of review, because evidence was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).