APCC Services, Inc. v. Sprint Communications Co., LP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• directing courts to “analyze the strength of the arguments in opposition to the challenged ruling” when evaluating a section 1292(b) certification motion
• “The impact that the appeal will have on other cases is also a factor supporting a conclusion that the question is controlling.”
• “An immediate appeal would conserve judicial resources and spare the parties from possibly needless expense if it should turn out that this Court’s rulings are reversed.”
• “Resolution of this question would also assist many other courts in resolving similar disputes.”
• “The mere fact that a substantially greater number of judges have resolved the issue one way rather than another does not, of itself, tend to show that there is no ground for difference of opinion.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).