District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 4/26/2007
In Re Pennington
Citations
- 921 A.2d 135
- 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 227
- 2007 WL 1213220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that sanction of suspension with a fitness requirement was warranted in part because Ms. Pennington had \not express[ed] remorse for her deceitful actions\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Washington, Farrell, Kramer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-14· cited 43×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McClainCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-09-08· cited 37×
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-08-13· cited 28×
- In re HowesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-03-08· cited 26×
- In Re PelkeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-12-23· cited 21×
- In Re KlineDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-13· cited 18×
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-09-01· cited 14×
- In Re BachDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-02-26· cited 13×
- In Re HewettDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-13· cited 12×
- Raleigh Bynum, IIDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-12-13· cited 6×
- In Re ZakroffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-25· cited 5×
- In Re BleeckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-01-20· cited 3×
- In re KatzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-12-22· cited 3×
- In Re ReedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-06-05· cited 2×
- In Re UscinskiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-01· cited 1×
- In Re GodetteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-10-23· cited 1×
- In Re ShurtzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-08-04
- IN RE RICHARD J. BIANCODistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-11-17
- IN RE GERALD I. KATZDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-12-22
- In re James Stephen DelsordoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-04-15
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-06-06· cited 264×
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-06· cited 255×
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-05-05· cited 107×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-06-22· cited 66×
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-05-21· cited 66×
- Matter of VelasquezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-04-02· cited 50×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AngstCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-06-12· cited 41×
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-07-25· cited 34×
- In Re BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-09-16· cited 33×
- In Re HagerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-12-19· cited 33×
- In Re SandgroundDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-05-31· cited 28×
- In Re De MaioDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-03-02· cited 27×
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-07-28· cited 22×
- In Re RomanskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-06-05· cited 19×
- In Re OutlawDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-03-01· cited 10×
- In Re MeadenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 7×
- In Re FosheeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-04-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.