Skip to main content
· 8/13/2009

In Re Guberman

Citations

  • 978 A.2d 200
  • 2009 D.C. App. LEXIS 347
  • 2009 WL 2460830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • detailing facts of several dishonesty cases, a number involving falsified documents, altered forms, or misrepresentations on applications, in which suspensory sanctions were imposed
  • Board recommended eighteen-month suspension based on multiple dishonest statements to law firm, over period of year, in connection with single case
  • “[T]he ‘serious doubt’ that Cater requires for 19 imposition of a fitness requirement must involve more than ‘no confidence that [a] [r]espondent will not engage in similar conduct in the future.’”
  • eighteen-month suspension for lying to a law firm supervisor about having filed an appeal and creating false court filing stamps on papers, thereby \falsely certifying that the papers had been filed in court\ (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Thompson, Farrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.