In Re Pelkey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a violation of Rule 4.4 (a) based on conduct that Pelkey took while proceeding pro se
• disbarring attorney with no prior discipline for lack of remorse after engaging in fraud
• “Pelkey’s lack of remorse has been evident throughout the disciplinary proceeding and, despite the overwhelming evidence against him, he continues to resist acknowledging his wrongful and unethical conduct.”
• “Pelkey’s lack of remorse has been evident throughout the disciplinary proceeding and, despite the overwhelming evidence against him, he continues to resist acknowledging his wrongful and unethical conduct.”
• attorney violated Rule 8.4(d), among others, when he sought the court’s assistance in attempting to evade an arbitration agreement he had signed and misrepresented the trial court’s ruling on appeal
• acknowledging flagrant dishonesty supports disbarment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).