Skip to main content

Citations

  • 11 A.3d 279
  • 2011 D.C. App. LEXIS 10
  • 2011 WL 102551

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that disbarment is the presumptive sanction for R. 1.15 (a) violations absent extraordinary circumstances (citing In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190, 191 (D.C. 1990) (en banc))
  • highlighting “truly unique” circumstances where intentional misappropriation benefited client by preserving client’s Medicaid eligibility
  • declining to disbar attorney who intentionally misappropriated client funds solely to benefit the client
  • prematurely withdrawing attorney’s fees from client’s account to ensure client did not lose Medicaid eligibility due to an excess of funds in the account

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Kramer, Blackburne-Rigsby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Hewett

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.