Skip to main content

In Re Cleaver-Bascombe

Citations

  • 986 A.2d 1191
  • 2010 D.C. App. LEXIS 4
  • 2010 WL 114004

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that absence of prior discipline was “massively outweighed by the aggravating factor — testifying falsely under oath in the disciplinary proceeding that the voucher was indeed accurate”
  • noting that absence of prior discipline was “massively outweighed by the aggravating factor — testifying falsely under oath in the disciplinary proceeding that the voucher was indeed accurate”
  • noting that voucher fraud requires a particularly severe penalty because, “in the interest of effective general deterrence, the severity of a sanction should take into account the difficulty of detecting and proving the misconduct at issue”
  • noting that voucher fraud requires a particularly severe penalty because, “in the interest of effective general deterrence, the severity of a sanction should take into account the difficulty of detecting and proving the misconduct at issue”
  • noting that the purpose of imposing attorney discipline is not to punish
  • ‘‘[L]ying under oath on the part of an attorney for the purpose of attempting to cover-up previous misconduct is absolutely intolerable . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reid, Newman, Wagner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.