In Re Corizzi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that because the attorney’s conduct was so egregious, “[wjhat his precise motives were or whether he bene-fitted financially is not determinative”
• noting that because the attorney’s conduct was so egregious, “[w]hat his precise motives were or whether he bene-fitted financially is not determinative”
• indicating that dishonest conduct including false statements made to Bar Counsel during investigation was an aggravating factor
• imposing disbarment for dishonesty after attorney suborned perjury from two of his clients and observing that the attorney need not financially benefit from the 2 sanction should be mitigated based on In re Kersey, 520 A.2d 321 (D.C. 1987
• “these ethical violations do not each stand alone as a single incident .... but ... in conjunction with a series of additional serious violations.”
• “these ethical violations do not each stand alone as a single incident .... but ... in conjunction with a series of additional serious violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).