Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 1/25/2013

In re Payne

Citations

  • 707 F.3d 195
  • 84 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 889
  • 2013 WL 297728
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 1715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that this Court’s local rules give the Grievance Panel “no more authority to revisit a prior panel’s decisions than any other three-judge panel of this Court”
  • discussing attorney who permitted briefing deadlines to expire while awaiting stipulations to withdraw his clients’ appeals
  • discussing attorney who permitted briefing deadlines to expire while awaiting stipulations to withdraw his clients’ appeals
  • \We have given ... somewhat lesser deference to credibility findings based on an analysis of a witness's testimony.\
  • “We have given . . . somewhat lesser deference to credibility findings based on an analysis of a witness’s testimony.”
  • “We have given . . . somewhat lesser deference to credibility findings based on an analysis of a witness’s testimony.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cabranes, Per Curiam, Sack, Wesley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.