In re Tustaniwsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that attorney’s culpability was “somewhat mitigated, to the extent he engaged in the misconduct only because instructed to do so by his employer”
• \[I]ssues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[I]ssues not sufficiently argued in the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be addressed on appeal.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• attorney’s “failure to properly set forth his arguments for why the Court should grant relief . . . was a serious disservice to his clients, whose claims for relief were not even considered by the Court due to [the attorney’s] failure to properly present them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).