Jin Chen v. United States Department of Justice & Attorney General Gonzales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the record did not support the agency’s adverse credibility finding in the absence of additional probing
• holding that the record did not support adverse credibility determination in the absence of additional questioning
• holding that we generally defer to IJ’s demeanor findings
• affirming the denial of asylum on other grounds, but characterizing Falun Gong as a religion
• giving “particular 14 deference to credibility determinations that are based on the adjudicator’s 15 observation of the applicant’s demeanor”
• giving “particular 19 deference to credibility determinations that are based on the 20 adjudicator’s observation of the applicant’s demeanor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).