United States v. Arthur Morrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that jury’s guilty verdict rendered harmless any evidentiary error in 7 procurement of indictment
• holding that a break in the chain of custody, if it did occur, “do[es] not bear upon the admissibility of evidence, only the weight of the evidence”
• holding, in context of sufficiency challenge, that jury's choice of competing inference receives deference and that \[p]roof of the elements of the crimes charged may be entirely by circumstantial evidence\
• explaining that when reviewing a sufficiency challenge, 20 we “assum[e] that the jury resolved all questions of witness credibility and competing inferences 21 in favor of the prosecution”
• affirming fourteen-level departure that was an accumulation of separate two and three-level enhancements linked to consequences suffered by ten different victims
• holding that no such claim exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).