· 3/22/2011
In Re Warburgh
Citations
- 644 F.3d 173
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 5924
- 2011 WL 1004911
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that default in disciplinary proceeding was “both an independent basis for disciplinary action and an aggravating factor”
- stating that default in disciplinary proceeding was “both an independent basis for disciplinary action and an aggravating factor”
- holding that attorney’s failure to 8 respond to an order to show cause why he should not be disciplined, issued 9 by this Court’s Committee on Admissions and Grievances, may be treated as 10 both an independent basis for disciplinary action and an aggravating factor
- “[I]n most cases, when an attorney knowingly defaults in a disciplinary proceeding, and fails to show good cause or excusable neglect for the default, the resulting disciplinary measure, for that misconduct alone, should be no less than a public reprimand.”
- granting leave to withdraw from bar; discussing relevant factors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cabranes, Sack, Wesley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.