In Re Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that, by employing the word “applicable,” which the dictionary defines as “capable of being applied” or “readily applicable or practical,” the drafters of the statute suggest that the standards must be interpreted in the context of the Manual
• reasoning that, by employing the word “applicable,” which the dictionary defines as “capable of being applied” or “readily applicable or practical,” the drafters of the statute suggest that the standards must be interpreted in the context of the Manual

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ross-Tousey v. Neary
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-12-17· cited 78×
• Ransom v. MBNA America Bank, N.A. (In Re Ransom)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-27· cited 64×
• Fokkena v. Hartwick
  D. Minnesota· 2007-08-20· cited 46×
• Neary v. Ross-Tousey (In Re Ross-Tousey)
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2007-05-21· cited 38×
• Pearson v. Stewart (In Re Pearson)
  Tenth Circuit· 2008-07-28· cited 25×
• Grossman v. Sawdy
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2008-03-17· cited 23×
• In Re Mati
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-06-09· cited 19×
• Wieland v. Thomas
  D. Kansas· 2008-03-04· cited 16×
• In Re Lynch
  E.D. Virginia· 2007-05-08· cited 14×
• In Re Brown
  S.D. Texas· 2007-10-16· cited 12×
• In Re Young
  D. Massachusetts· 2008-08-08· cited 11×
• In Re Osei
  S.D. New York· 2008-06-25· cited 9×
• In Re Egbert
  E.D. Arkansas· 2008-04-10· cited 7×
• In Re Vesper
  D. Alaska· 2007-06-28· cited 6×
• In Re Wilson
  W.D. Arkansas· 2007-07-30· cited 6×
• In re: Michael J. Luedtke and Katherine L. Luedtke
  Ninth Circuit· 2014-04-09· cited 6×
• In re Sires
  S.D. Georgia· 2014-06-04· cited 6×
• In Re Coffin
  D. Maine· 2008-11-18· cited 5×
• In Re Hubbard
  N.D. Indiana· 2007-10-12· cited 1×
• Neary, William T. v. Ross-Tousey, Marvin
  Seventh Circuit· 2008-12-17

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• In Re Slusher
  D. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
• In Re McGuire
  W.D. Missouri· 2006-06-01· cited 93×
• In Re Fowler
  D. Delaware· 2006-09-11· cited 84×
• In Re Harris
  E.D. Oklahoma· 2006-10-13· cited 72×
• In Re Barraza
  N.D. Texas· 2006-08-01· cited 56×
• In Re Hartwick
  D. Minnesota· 2006-10-13· cited 55×
• In Re Haley
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-10-18· cited 49×
• In Re Carlin
  D. Oregon· 2006-08-18· cited 49×
• In Re Oliver
  W.D. Texas· 2006-08-08· cited 44×
• In Re Miller
  N.D. Alabama· 2007-01-18· cited 40×
• In Re Grunert
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-11-20· cited 38×
• In Re Zak
  N.D. Ohio· 2007-01-12· cited 32×
• In Re Ceasar
  W.D. Louisiana· 2007-03-06· cited 24×