In Re Love

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he means test is based upon historic income figures. Section 101(10A

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Edmunds
  D. South Carolina· 2005-09-18· cited 79×
• In Re Devilliers
  E.D. Louisiana· 2007-01-09· cited 68×
• In Re McGillis
  W.D. Michigan· 2007-05-15· cited 52×
• In Re Henebury
  S.D. Florida· 2007-03-16· cited 50×
• Fokkena v. Hartwick
  D. Minnesota· 2007-08-20· cited 46×
• In Re Miller
  N.D. Alabama· 2007-01-18· cited 40×
• In Re Benedetti
  S.D. Florida· 2007-07-13· cited 29×
• In Re Norwood-Hill
  M.D. Florida· 2009-03-19· cited 24×
• In Re Quigley
  N.D. West Virginia· 2008-06-20· cited 22×
• In Re Spurgeon
  E.D. Tennessee· 2007-10-10· cited 20×
• In Re Burden
  W.D. Missouri· 2007-12-20· cited 17×
• In Re Ralston
  M.D. Florida· 2009-02-10· cited 15×
• In Re Galyon
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2007-03-22· cited 14×
• In Re Rahman
  E.D. New York· 2009-01-23· cited 12×
• Morse v. Rudler
  First Circuit· 2009-08-05· cited 9×
• In Re James
  S.D. Georgia· 2008-09-05· cited 9×
• In Re Burbank
  D. Rhode Island· 2009-02-24· cited 9×
• Lynch v. Haenke
  E.D. North Carolina· 2008-09-30· cited 8×
• In Re Holmes
  M.D. Florida· 2008-03-17· cited 7×
• In Re Makres
  N.D. Oklahoma· 2007-12-07· cited 6×