S.D. Florida· 3/2/2001
In Re Managed Care Litigation
Citations
- 135 F. Supp. 2d 1253
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7776
- 2001 WL 220108
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that there may be matters of dispute falling outside of the scope of the contractual agreements and concluding that the unjust enrichment counts could therefore proceed
- recognizing the legitimacy of a quasi-contractual claim despite the existence of a contract because “there may be matters of dispute which are outside the scope of the contracts”
- recognizing the legitimacy of a quasi- contractual claim despite the existence of a contract because “there may be matters of dispute which are outside the scope of the contracts”
- finding no ERISA preemption based upon provider’s breach of contract and violations of Florida statutory law claims
- “It is the duty of this Court to follow controlling Eleventh Circuit precedent unless there is a direct Supreme Court case on the particular issue in question holding to the contrary.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moreno
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Managed Care LitigationS.D. Florida· 2003-12-08· cited 54×
- In Re Managed Care LitigationS.D. Florida· 2002-02-20· cited 38×
- Young v. Wells Fargo & Co.S.D. Iowa· 2009-10-27· cited 19×
- Foley v. Southwest Texas HMO, Inc.E.D. Texas· 2002-07-19· cited 13×
- Medical Society of New York v. Connecticut General Corp.S.D. New York· 2001-10-26· cited 10×
- Feldman's Medical Center Pharmacy, Inc. v. Carefirst, Inc.D. Maryland· 2010-06-29· cited 6×
- Sheridan Healthcorp., Inc. v. Neighborhood Health Partnership, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2006-09-22· cited 2×
- Herrera-Edwards v. Moore (In re Herrera-Edwards)M.D. Florida· 2017-06-19· cited 2×
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court· 1975-06-25· cited 10,875×
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1983-06-24· cited 3,550×
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 3,533×
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court· 1975-06-17· cited 3,337×
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 2,648×
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 2,418×
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 2,158×
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 1,688×
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court· 1994-04-19· cited 1,685×
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court· 1979-11-13· cited 1,476×
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court· 1984-05-14· cited 1,473×
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-01-11· cited 1,218×
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 1,166×
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court· 1987-06-22· cited 1,121×
- Pegram v. HerdrichSupreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 1,043×
- Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court· 2000-02-23· cited 698×
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1987-11-16· cited 684×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.