Supreme Court· 2/23/2000

Rotella v. Wood

Citations

528 U.S. 549
120 S. Ct. 1075
145 L. Ed. 2d 1047
2000 U.S. LEXIS 1537

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the statute of limitations for RICO claims begins to run upon Plaintiffs discovery of the injury, not discovery of the other elements of the claim
holding that accrual occurs upon “the point of injury or its reasonable discovery”
holding that plaintiffs RICO claim was barred by the statute of limitations
holding RICO claims accrue upon a plaintiff's discovery of their injury, not discovery of Defendants’ actions
noting that court should not permit contract claims nor simple fraud disputes to be transformed into RICO claims
reserving the question of whether the injury discovery rule applies in civil RICO and, by extension, Clayton Act cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Souter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

351 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Rotella v. Wood

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.