Young v. Wells Fargo & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• alleging that lender designed a system “to automatically charge as many property inspection fees as possible” and “no one reviews the results of the property inspections”
• “Hence, the basis of the alleged ex-cessiveness is that Wells Fargo charged fees when they should not, a wholly different claim from a claim that Wells Fargo applied an illegal interest rate.”
• “‘Shotgun pleading’ is especially problematic with respect to pleading numerous causes of action under a variety of state consumer protection statutes because the type and degree of protection offered by the various state laws varies extensively.”
• “The Court concurs with other courts that have concluded that this structure [of the RICO statute] indicates that Congress intended § 1962(c) to reach only actors directly involved in racketeering activities, and not aiders and abettors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).