Oregon Supreme Court· 5/20/2004
In Re Knappenberger
Citations
- 90 P.3d 614
- 337 Or. 15
- 2004 Ore. LEXIS 317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suspending the accused for a total of 90 days and noting that the lawyer’s neglect of a single client’s legal matter merited a 60-day suspension where the aggravating factors outweighed the mitigating factors
- wording of rule that exercise of professional judgment “reasonably may be affected” by lawyer’s personal or financial interests “expresses a lesser degree of certainty and sweeps more broadly” than “will be * * * affected” wording
- accused’s repeated failure to contact client or respond to events related to an unsuccessful appeal constituted neglect under a previous, but identically worded, rule of professional conduct
- setting out DR 7-110(B), including DR 7-110(B)(4
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court· 2006-05-18· cited 10×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReddenOregon Supreme Court· 2007-02-23· cited 9×
- In Re the Reciprocal Discipline of LopezOregon Supreme Court· 2011-04-07· cited 8×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KnappenbergerOregon Supreme Court· 2005-03-24· cited 8×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SnyderOregon Supreme Court· 2010-05-27· cited 6×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of JacksonOregon Supreme Court· 2009-12-24· cited 3×
- In Re LeuenbergerOregon Supreme Court· 2004-07-15· cited 3×
- In re MunnOregon Supreme Court· 2024-07-25· cited 2×
- State v. EstacioCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-04-13· cited 1×
- RFF Family Partnership, L.P. v. Burns & Levinson, LLPMassachusetts Superior Court· 2012-11-21· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court· 1993-05-13· cited 198×
- Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 66×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court· 1987-03-31· cited 47×
- In Re JonesOregon Supreme Court· 1997-12-18· cited 39×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KlugeOregon Supreme Court· 2003-04-10· cited 29×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 27×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 25×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of McKeeOregon Supreme Court· 1993-04-15· cited 25×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SchaffnerOregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-27· cited 24×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ReckerOregon Supreme Court· 1990-04-03· cited 18×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court· 2004-05-06· cited 14×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LawrenceOregon Supreme Court· 2001-09-13· cited 14×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HoppOregon Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 14×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MagarOregon Supreme Court· 2003-04-10· cited 10×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of TonkonOregon Supreme Court· 1982-03-16· cited 9×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HowserOregon Supreme Court· 1999-10-07· cited 7×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LaBahnOregon Supreme Court· 2003-04-17· cited 6×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HarringtonOregon Supreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 6×
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of WorthOregon Supreme Court· 2003-12-26· cited 5×
- In re the Marriage of BridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-04-12· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.