In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Schaffner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding lawyer violated rule by failing to respond timely to Bar inquiries
• finding pattern of misconduct where accused repeatedly failed to respond or to take action to protect clients’ interests and failed to answer Bar’s continuing inquiries over considerable period of time
• finding pattern of misconduct where accused repeatedly failed to respond or to take action to protect clients' interests and failed to answer Bar's continuing inquiries over considerable period of time
• applying that standard in similar circumstances
• failure to appear before trial panel does not constitute violation of DR 1-103(0). 6 ORS 162.065(1
• “The mitigating factors do not outweigh the aggravating factors, even though lack of a prior disciplinary record is a strong mitigating factor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).