In Re Leuenberger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the lawyer violated former DR 5-101(A)(1) when he failed to advise the client to seek independent legal advice, notwithstanding that the lawyer had notified the cli- ent orally and in writing of potential conflict of interest
• under former DR 7-102(A)(2), predecessor of RPC 3.1, proper focus is on the legitimacy of the legal position asserted rather than on an accused's motivation in taking a particular action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).