In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hopp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no DR 5-101(A) violation when accused had incidental financial or proprietary interest in outcome of litigation
• lawyer violated former DR 7-102(A)(1) when he admitted he had had \no other purpose\ than to harass opposing counsel
• accused lawyer violated DR 7-102(A)(1) when he admittedly had “no other purpose” than to harass opposing counsel
• lawyer suspended for 60 days for taking action for purpose of harassing another lawyer, violating DR 7-102(A)(1), and for misrepresenting that he had done so on behalf of his “client,” violating former DR 1-102(A)(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).