Skip to main content

In Re Jones

Citations

  • 951 P.2d 149
  • 326 Or. 195
  • 1997 Ore. LEXIS 599

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that this court considers only “offenses that have been adjudicated,” but nevertheless noting that accused had engaged in misconduct that resulted in letters of admonition
  • stating that DR 1-102(A)(3) “requires, at the least, that a lawyer knowingly engage in a misrepresentation” (emphasis in original). However, it is apparent from the text of ORS 9.527(4
  • setting out nonexhaustive list of factors that serve to heighten or diminish significance of earlier misconduct
  • stating that weight accorded prior offense as aggravating factor determined by reference to relative seriousness of prior offense and resulting sanction, number of prior offenses, relative recency of prior offense, and timing of current offense in relation to prior offense
  • listing the factors to consider in determining the weight to give prior ethical violations
  • delay in disciplinary proceeding can act as mitigating factor when lawyer did not contribute to delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.