In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Recker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to resolve dispute about whether conduct that had been found to violate DR 1-102(A)(3) also violation of DR 7-102(A)(5), because sanction for first violation would not be enhanced by second finding
• declining to resolve dispute about whether conduct that had been found to violate DR 1-102(A)(3) also violation of DR 7-102(A)(5), because sanction for first violation would not be enhanced by second finding
• lawyer violated DR 1-102(A)(3) by informing court that client had failed to maintain contact, when it was lawyer who had failed to maintain contact
• court imposed a two-year suspension upon a lawyer found guilty of violating DR 6-101(B) and 1-103(C), in addition to two other violations
• accused lawyer neglected matter when she accepted client’s case, but failed to return calls, failed to perform any work on matter, and failed to return original documents or cash advance
• recognized conflict in precedent and declined to decide whether DR 7-102(A) applied to case where the accused misled court to advance her own interests because the misconduct was a violation of DR 1-102(A)(3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).