Skip to main content

In Re Hill

Citations

  • 397 B.R. 259
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 502
  • 2007 WL 499622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if a creditor is secured by personal property, then Section 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii)(II) requires that the amount of the monthly payment must be sufficient to provide adequate protection to the creditor
  • holding that administrative expense claims “may be paid each month after the payment of the adequate protection payment that is required by Section 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii)(IR”). 7 III. Conclusion For the reasons stated above, this Court concludes that: (i
  • “[A] Chapter 13 plan must provide that a secured creditor retain its lien until the payment of the entire underlying debt or the entry of the discharge, not simply until the secured portion of the debt is paid.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waldrep

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.