United States v. Yellin (In Re Weinstein)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts must consider the text, context, legislative history, and underlying policies when interpreting a bankruptcy statute
• noting that a “conflict between two provisions of [a] statute — a conflict with which neither provision deals expressly ... provides a reason to move beyond the text and to examine a statute’s legislative history and apparent purpose”
• noting that a \conflict between two provisions of [a] statute -- a conflict with which neither provision deals expressly . . . provides a reason to move beyond the text and to examine a statute's legislative history and apparent purpose\
• indicating that the text of one section of the Bankruptcy Code controls if its meaning is clear, but that a single section need not be read in isolation if other sections provide textual evidence of the meaning of the section in question
• “A question of the interpretation of the Bankruptcy Code, like any other question of statutory interpretation, is a question of law that we review de novo.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).