In Re Willis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f the security is personal property, the payments must be sufficient to adequately protect the collateral, in other words, compensate the creditor for collateral depreciation over the life of the plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Miceli
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-07-09· cited 8×
• In Re Kirk
  N.D. Alabama· 2012-01-23· cited 7×
• In re Romero
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2015-10-09· cited 5×
• In re Williams
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-04-10· cited 5×

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re DeSardi
  S.D. Texas· 2006-04-21· cited 66×
• In Re Hill
  M.D. North Carolina· 2007-02-12· cited 20×
• Royals v. Massey (In Re Denton)
  S.D. Georgia· 2007-06-12· cited 18×
• In Re Erwin
  C.D. Illinois· 2007-10-01· cited 17×
• In Re Balderas
  W.D. Texas· 2005-04-20· cited 14×
• In Re Lemieux
  D. Massachusetts· 2006-08-16· cited 11×
• In Re Sanchez
  D. Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 9×
• In Re Marks
  N.D. Illinois· 2008-09-25· cited 9×
• Wells Fargo Financial Georgia, Inc. v. Baxter (In Re Williams)
  S.D. Georgia· 2008-03-28· cited 9×
• In Re Henning
  W.D. Tennessee· 2009-11-06· cited 9×
• In Re Butler
  W.D. Arkansas· 2009-03-17· cited 5×
• In Re Moses
  E.D. Michigan· 2003-06-05· cited 4×
• In Re Bosse
  D. Maine· 2009-07-14· cited 2×
• In Re Bellamy
  D. Maryland· 2007-11-28· cited 1×