S.D. Texas· 4/21/2006
In Re DeSardi
Citations
- 340 B.R. 790
- 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 913
- 2006 WL 1061893
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a balloon payment in the 60th month when the car would be worth less than the balloon payment puts all risk of loss on the car lender
- “Nor does the section state that payments must be equal ‘as of the effective date of the plan.’ ”
- “The statute refers only to payment of any unpaid claim. There is no reference to a partial payment.”
- “the car lender’s adequate protection payments are senior in priority to the payments to debt- or’s counsel.”
- “Because this interpretation is contrary to the plain meaning of the plans, the Court rejects the interpretation and will apply the plain meaning.”
- \[T]he equal payment provision requires that payments be level once they begin and terminate once the lender is fully paid. Exactly when these level payments begin is case-specific.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marvin Isgur
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- AmeriCredit Financial Services, Inc. v. LongSixth Circuit· 2008-03-04· cited 38×
- In Re TrejosD. Nevada· 2006-09-25· cited 28×
- In Re HayesM.D. Tennessee· 2007-11-01· cited 27×
- DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC v. Taranto (In Re Taranto)Sixth Circuit· 2007-03-30· cited 24×
- In Re WamplerD. Kansas· 2006-06-29· cited 24×
- Perez v. PeakeS.D. Texas· 2007-07-19· cited 24×
- In re SoppickE.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-08-28· cited 23×
- In Re SolisS.D. Texas· 2006-11-14· cited 21×
- In Re HillM.D. North Carolina· 2007-02-12· cited 20×
- Hamilton v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Hamilton)First Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 18×
- Royals v. Massey (In Re Denton)S.D. Georgia· 2007-06-12· cited 18×
- In Re DeanEleventh Circuit· 2008-08-07· cited 17×
- In Re ErwinC.D. Illinois· 2007-10-01· cited 17×
- In Re BuffordN.D. Texas· 2006-06-13· cited 15×
- In Re GreenM.D. Georgia· 2006-08-30· cited 14×
- In Re LemieuxD. Massachusetts· 2006-08-16· cited 11×
- In Re SanchezD. Oregon· 2008-03-19· cited 9×
- In Re BethoneyD. Massachusetts· 2008-01-17· cited 9×
- In Re MarksN.D. Illinois· 2008-09-25· cited 9×
- Wells Fargo Financial Georgia, Inc. v. Baxter (In Re Williams)S.D. Georgia· 2008-03-28· cited 9×
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 4,657×
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-02-21· cited 3,653×
- United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court· 1988-01-20· cited 1,871×
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,579×
- Sosa v. Alvarez-MachainSupreme Court· 2004-06-29· cited 1,133×
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court· 1819-02-22· cited 668×
- Jama v. Immigration and Customs EnforcementSupreme Court· 2005-01-12· cited 589×
- Till v. SCS Credit Corp.Supreme Court· 2004-05-17· cited 381×
- Stellwagen v. ClumSupreme Court· 1918-02-04· cited 330×
- Trustees of the Amalgamated Insurance Fund v. McFarlin's, Inc.Second Circuit· 1986-04-10· cited 217×
- In the Matter of John W. Foster, Jr. And Myrtha D. Foster, Debtors. John W. Foster, Jr., and Myrtha D. Foster v. William Heitkamp, TrusteeFifth Circuit· 1982-03-01· cited 127×
- Ford Motor Credit Company v. Rayfeal C. Dobbins, A/K/A Ray C. Dobbins Mary Ellen DobbinsFourth Circuit· 1994-09-15· cited 85×
- In Re EzellE.D. Tennessee· 2006-03-13· cited 55×
- In Re JohnsonM.D. North Carolina· 2006-02-02· cited 51×
- In Re CarverS.D. Georgia· 2006-03-06· cited 46×
- In Re RobinsonW.D. Missouri· 2006-02-10· cited 43×
- In Re MontoyaD. Utah· 2006-04-10· cited 41×
- In Re FlemingE.D. Missouri· 2006-03-27· cited 41×
- Unnamed caseFifth Circuit· 1993-01-22· cited 40×
- In Re WrightM.D. Alabama· 2006-02-28· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.