Skip to main content
M.D. Georgia· 9/1/2016

In re Cochran

Citations

  • 555 B.R. 892
  • 2016 Bankr. LEXIS 3211
  • 2016 WL 4575557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding Erwin's discussion of the congressional intent with respect to section 1325(a)(5)(B)(iii) to \be the result of mere educated speculation\ rather than \citations to formal legislative history\
  • \The language of § 1325(a)(5)(B) indicates that the property distributed on account of a claim need not be of a singular type and need not be made in a singular manner.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.