Skip to main content
C.D. California· 7/12/1995

In Re Hicks

Citations

  • 184 B.R. 954
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 1022
  • 27 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 676
  • 1995 WL 447359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reopening is proper for six reasons: 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lisa Hill Fenning

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Hicks

47 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.