In Re Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the debtor was not entitled to deduct under section 707(b)(2
• noting that contributions to an adult child’s education would support a finding of abuse under section 707(b)(3)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McDow v. Williams (In Re Williams)
  W.D. Virginia· 2010-03-01· cited 8×
• In Re Barbutes
  M.D. Tennessee· 2010-09-08· cited 5×
• In Re Linville
  D. New Mexico· 2011-02-15· cited 4×
• In re Schumacher
  W.D. Texas· 2013-05-20· cited 3×
• In re Smith
  W.D. Oklahoma· 2018-05-30· cited 3×
• In Re Clingman
  S.D. Texas· 2009-02-17· cited 1×
• In re Behne
  D. Nebraska· 2017-08-25· cited 1×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Stapleton v. Mundy (In Re Mundy)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-03-01· cited 28×