A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through Xc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiffs may not avoid preclusion by alleging new legal theories
• “A federal court sitting in diversity must apply the res judicata law of the state in which it sits.”
• whether substantially the same evidence will be presented in both actions is a factor we may consider in determining the applicability of res judicata
• A “federal court sitting in diversity must apply the res judica-ta law of the state in which it sits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).