Skip to main content
D. New Hampshire· 4/26/1996

In Re Walker

Citations

  • 195 B.R. 187
  • 1996 Bankr. LEXIS 457
  • 1996 WL 230215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it had the power to set a 90-day deadline for the filing of section 523(c)(1) complaints in reopened cases
  • holding that it had the power to set a 90-day deadline for the filing of section 523(c)(1) complaints in reopened cases
  • showing the form order as “Annex A” to the opinion, which lists most of the findings above
  • “[L]isting an omitted creditor on the schedules in a no-asset case has no legal significance per se with regard to the dischargeability of a creditor’s claim....”
  • “[Lasting an omitted creditor on the schedules in a no-asset case has no legal significance per se with regard to the dischargeability of a creditor’s claim ... ”
  • “[T]he creditor must prove ... the usual elements of nondischargeability under ... [Section 523(a)(2), (4) or (6) ].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James E. Yacos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.