In Re Linzer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that nine days’ notice is inadequate
• “[W]hen a non-bankruptcy counsel is actively engaged in prosecuting a creditor’s claim against the debtor before a non-bankruptcy tribunal ... that is a sufficient nexus to the bankruptcy case to justify imputing authorized agency.”
• “Th[e] general rule for imputing an agent’s notice or knowledge applies in bankruptcy cases.”
• when a non-bankruptcy counsel is actively engaged in prosecuting a creditor’s claim against the debt- or before a non-bankruptcy tribunal ... that is a sufficient nexus to the bankruptcy case to justify imputing authorized agency
• notice imputed from attorney to creditor where attorney did not participate in debtor’s bankruptcy case but whose activity on behalf of the creditor in a non-bankruptcy proceeding was significant and ongoing at the time of the bankruptcy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).