In Re Hicks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying debtor’s “Motion to Add Creditors” and explaining that “[d]ebts incurred after the date of the filing of the chapter 7 petition, although they may appear on a list of creditors, are not discharged”
• \Debts incurred after the date of the filing of the chapter 7 . . . are not discharged. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Clarke v. Paige (In Re Clarke)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2001-08-21· cited 16×
• In Re Lawrence
  S.D. Florida· 1999-07-02· cited 1×