Skip to main content
· 3/12/2010

Melton v. Boustred

Citations

  • 183 Cal. App. 4th 521
  • 107 Cal. Rptr. 3d 481
  • 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 447

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing plaintiff’s nuisance claim because it 8 “merely restates their negligence claims”
  • “[D]efendant’s conduct in issuing that invitation [to a party at his home] did not create the peril that harmed plaintiffs.”
  • “Where the negligence and nuisance causes of action rely on the same facts about lack of due care ... the nuisance claim stands or falls with the determination of the negligence cause of action .... ”
  • “Where there is a legal basis for imposing a duty—as in cases of misfeasance or when a special relationship exists-—the court considers the foreseeability of risk from the third party conduct.”
  • “Misfeasance exists when the defendant is responsible for making the plaintiff's position worse, i.e., defendant has created a risk. Conversely, nonfeasance is found when the defendant has failed to aid plaintiff through beneficial intervention.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McADAMS

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.