In Re Epic Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the delay in filing the motion to disqualify was not prejudicial because “almost no discovery” had been conducted at the time of filing
• concluding that an appeal of a ruling on attorney disqualification does not adequately remedy the injury suffered by the party whose counsel was disqualified
• holding that trial court had clearly abused its discretion in declining to disqualify a civil law firm that had represented the defendant in a matter whose claims were \substantially related\ to those in the pending lawsuit
• holding that trial court had clearly abused its discretion in declining to disqualify a civil law firm that had represented the defendant in a matter whose claims were \substantially related\ to those in the pending lawsuit
• “Members of a law firm cannot disavow access to confidential information of any one attorney’s client.”
• “We have repeatedly observed that 'the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct do not determine whether counsel is disqualified in litigation, but they do provide guidelines and suggest the relevant considerations’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).