Morrow v. H.E.B., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asserting that a finding of good cause is the only manner in which the automatic exclusion under rule 215(5) can be avoided
• exclusion of testimony mandated for failure to provide the address of a potential witness when it becomes available, even though it was not known when originally requested
• exclusion of testimony mandated for failure to provide the address of a potential witness when it becomes available, even though it was not known when originally requested
• the sanctions are automatic unless good cause is shown
• lack of surprise is not good cause
• interpreting Rule 215, Tex. R. Civ. P.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).