Tenneco Inc. v. Enterprise Products Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Texas courts have long refused to imply restraints that are absent from the agreement
• holding that a nonmovant who needs additional evidence to prepare a summary-judgment response must properly request a continuance
• holding that courts must not “rewrite agreements to insert provisions parties could have included or to imply restraints for which they have not bargained”
• recognizing that courts have long refused to imply restraints that are absent from the agreement
• recognizing that courts have long refused to imply restraints that are absent from the agreement
• holding that “stock sales do not invoke preemptive rights” and noting how “[a] contrary conclusion is an unwarranted impingement on the free transfer of stock”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).