Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 6/29/2000
Austin v. Kerr-McGee Refining Corp.
Citations
- 25 S.W.3d 280
- 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 4317
- 2000 WL 854294
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A] trial court could not properly review the reliability of scientific testimony based on epidemiological studies if it were required to ignore the basic principles articulated in Havner that the scientific community employs in conducting such studies.”
- “[A] trial court could not properly review the reliability of scientific testimony based on epidemiological studies if it were required to ignore the basic principles articulated in Havner that the scientific community employs in conducting such studies.”
- ―[A] trial court could not properly review the reliability of scientific testimony based on epidemiological studies if it were required to ignore the basic principles articulated in Havner that the scientific community employs in conducting such studies.‖
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cornelius, Grant, Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Coastal Tankships, U.S.A., Inc. v. AndersonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-08-08· cited 99×
- General Motors Corporation v. BurryCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-29· cited 77×
- Plunkett v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2009-06-30· cited 46×
- Gross v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2004-09-30· cited 39×
- Exxon Corp. v. Makofski Ex Rel. MakofskiTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2003-10-23· cited 33×
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. NavarroTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-11-04· cited 30×
- Abraham v. Union Pacific RailroadTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-08-23· cited 28×
- Faust v. BNSF Railway Co.Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2011-03-10· cited 27×
- Scott's Marina at Lake Grapevine Ltd. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2012-01-28· cited 17×
- Kevin Glenn Schronk, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Helen Patricia Schronk, and Dustin Schronk v. Laerdal Medical CorporationTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2013-12-12· cited 14×
- Daniels v. Lyondell-Citgo Refining Co.Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-03-20· cited 12×
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Harmar Bottling Co.Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2003-07-17· cited 10×
- Manasco v. Insurance Co. of the State of PennsylvaniaTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2002-10-10· cited 8×
- Matt Dietz Co. v. TorresTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2006-07-20· cited 7×
- Burton v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products Corp.N.D. Texas· 2007-04-09· cited 3×
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2015-08-19
- Coastal Tankship, U.S.A., Inc. v. Florence Anderson, Administratrix of the Estate of Morris AndersonTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2002-05-31
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2003-02-06
- Unnamed caseTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2004-09-02
- Mark Irwin Stevens v. Lynn StevensTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2006-09-21
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1985-12-04· cited 6,606×
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court· 1997-11-13· cited 3,583×
- EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court· 1996-07-08· cited 1,699×
- Goode v. ShoukfehTexas Supreme Court· 1997-04-18· cited 612×
- Mitchell v. Gencorp Inc.Tenth Circuit· 1999-01-07· cited 216×
- In Re Epic Holdings, Inc.Texas Supreme Court· 1998-12-31· cited 200×
- In Re PerrittTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1998-07-22· cited 27×
- In the Interest of Kates v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-10-04· cited 8×
- Chambers v. Exxon Corp.M.D. Louisiana· 2000-01-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.