District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 3/17/2005
In Re Edwards
Citations
- 870 A.2d 90
- 2005 D.C. App. LEXIS 55
- 2005 WL 612843
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a “six-month suspension without a fitness requirement is the norm for attorneys who have committed negligent misappropriation of entrusted funds together with the related violations (commingling, deficient record keeping)”
- requiring a practice monitor as condition of probation in lieu of imposing a fitness requirement
- declining to consider mitigation evidence where attorney failed to present evidence first to a hearing committee
- declining to consider mitigation evidence where attorney failed to present evidence first to a hearing committee
- imposing a period of oversight by a practice monitor commencing during suspension where court and the Board remained “concerned that [respondent] remains confused about [the appropriate operation of her legal practice] ... and still has not adopted adequate procedures in her law office”
- imposing a period of oversight by a practice monitor commencing during suspension where court and the Board remained “concerned that [respondent] remains confused about [the appropriate operation of her legal practice] . . . and still has not adopted adequate procedures in her law office”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Glickman, Kern
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-11-23· cited 94×
- In re MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-03-28· cited 49×
- In Re Cleaver-BascombeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-01-14· cited 43×
- In Re BaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-09-15· cited 43×
- In re AskewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-07-31· cited 17×
- In re SaloDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-07-18· cited 12×
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 11×
- In re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-08-22· cited 11×
- In Re GonzalezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-19· cited 7×
- In re BoykinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-07-29· cited 6×
- In re Brigitte L. AdamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-08-30· cited 4×
- In Re MaignanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-11-08· cited 2×
- In re GreenwaldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-06-14· cited 2×
- In re Douglas B. Evans, Sr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-06-28· cited 1×
- In re PatelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-05-17· cited 1×
- In re Kenneth A. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-02-13
- IN RE ABIGAIL ASKEWDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-07-31
- In re Kenneth A. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23
- IN RE SEAN P. MCMULLENDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-12-08
- In re Wendell RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-02-20
Cites
31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re KerseyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-01-28· cited 118×
- In Re GoffeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-05-05· cited 107×
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-13· cited 84×
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-19· cited 58×
- In Re FairDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-09-13· cited 42×
- In Re PeekDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-11-03· cited 41×
- In Re CorizziDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-07-25· cited 34×
- In Re LylesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-18· cited 29×
- In Re AustinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-09-02· cited 28×
- In Re TraversDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 22×
- In Re DunietzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-31· cited 21×
- In Re LopesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-04-12· cited 21×
- In Re ReedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-11· cited 18×
- In Re SumnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-10-19· cited 17×
- In Re StanbackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-30· cited 17×
- In Re ChangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-05-22· cited 17×
- Matter of CooperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-09-25· cited 16×
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-10-03· cited 15×
- In Re StowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-11-15· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.