District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 3/28/2013
In re Martin
Citations
- 67 A.3d 1032
- 2013 WL 1233890
- 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 96
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a settlement agreement had more than a de minimis effect on the disciplinary proceeding when the client sought “assurance from [respondent] that he would not retaliate for testifying,” and the client testified under subpoena
- stating that the Board \has the power to make its own factual findings” but \must accept the hearing committee's factual findings if they are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole”
- stating that the Board \has the power to make its own factual findings” but \must accept the hearing committee's factual findings if they are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole”
- stating that the Board \has the power to make its own factual findings” but \must accept the hearing committee's factual findings if they are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole”
- stating that the Board “has the power to make its own factual findings” but “must accept the hearing committee‟s factual findings if they are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole”
- stating that the Board \has the power to make its own factual findings” but \must accept the hearing committee's factual findings if they are supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackburne, Fisher, King, Rigsby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-12-24· cited 23×
- In re Harry TunDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-10-18· cited 18×
- In re Seth Adam RobbinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-08-30· cited 8×
- In re MurdterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-02-04· cited 7×
- In re SzymkowiczDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-09-17· cited 6×
- McKinney v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2014-12-04· cited 4×
- In re Brigitte L. AdamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-08-30· cited 4×
- PAMELA B. STUART v. BARBARA J. WALKERDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-07-28· cited 2×
- In Re Barry DowneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-06-29· cited 2×
- In re M. Adriana Koeck, a/k/a Adriana SanfordDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-02-08· cited 1×
- In re Nathaniel H. SpeightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-07-26· cited 1×
- In re Robert S. FastovDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-09-18
- In re Kenneth A. MartinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23
- IN RE JOHN T. SZYMKOWICZ, JOHN P. SZYMKOWICZ, LESLIE SILVERMAN, ROBERT KINGDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-09-17
- IN RE CHARLES P. MURDTERDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-02-04
- In re Nathaniel H.SpeightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-11-22
- In re Wendell RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-02-20
- In re Timothy D. NaegeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-02-27
- In re Wendell RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-05-14
- In re Roy L. Person, Jr.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-06-04
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-07-31· cited 161×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,679 in the Matter of the Arbitration Between Herbert Sobel, and Hertz, Warner & Co.Second Circuit· 1972-11-28· cited 159×
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Taxpayers Against Fraud and Chester L. Walsh v. General Electric CompanySixth Circuit· 1995-01-18· cited 130×
- International Travel Arrangers, Inc. v. Western Airlines, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 1980-06-10· cited 107×
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 106×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1999-09-07· cited 95×
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
- The Florida Bar v. FrederickSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-05-04· cited 64×
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 63×
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-27· cited 61×
- In Re TempleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-08-12· cited 58×
- Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court· 1984-07-10· cited 54×
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 51×
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-01-24· cited 49×
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-02-21· cited 46×
- In Re ElginDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-03-08· cited 37×
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-17· cited 33×
- In Re HagerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-12-19· cited 33×
- In Re ManceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-29· cited 32×
- In Re UkwuDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-06-21· cited 29×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.