District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 9/2/2004
In Re Austin
Citations
- 858 A.2d 969
- 2004 D.C. App. LEXIS 432
- 2004 WL 2035077
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that “the specification of charges and post-hearing filings fairly put respondent on notice of the fraud charges against him”
- holding that respondent charged with Rule 8.4(c
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, Ruiz, Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re CaterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-11-23· cited 94×
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-17· cited 33×
- In Re GubermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-08-13· cited 28×
- In re SamadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-09-05· cited 27×
- In Re SteeleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-02-17· cited 18×
- In re SilvaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-09-01· cited 14×
- In Re RomanskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-12-20· cited 10×
- In re NwadikeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-08-10· cited 10×
- In re WinsteadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-07-11· cited 8×
- In Re BinghamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-08-25· cited 6×
- In Re MorrellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-10-07· cited 4×
- Gary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2008-08-07· cited 4×
- In re FrancisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-04-28· cited 3×
- In re Estate of BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-08-23· cited 2×
- Savoy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-10-01· cited 1×
- In re Robert S. FastovDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-09-18
- IN RE ERNEST P. FRANCIS, ESQUIREDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-04-28
- In re Nathaniel H.SpeightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-11-22
- In Re Frederick Schwartz, JrDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-12-19
- In re SpeightsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-11-22
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re RebackDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-07-31· cited 161×
- In Re HutchinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-12-04· cited 140×
- Matter of HauptDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1980-10-17· cited 114×
- Matter of ShorterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-02-21· cited 84×
- Matter of SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1979-06-13· cited 84×
- In Re VieheDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-11-22· cited 73×
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 63×
- In Re KennedyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-04-20· cited 49×
- In Re SlatteryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-01-25· cited 49×
- In Re GilDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-04-03· cited 37×
- In Re HagerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-12-19· cited 33×
- In Re McLainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-02-29· cited 22×
- In Re HoldmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-11-06· cited 21×
- In Re Jones-TerrellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-05-28· cited 13×
- In Re KitchingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-30· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.