District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 10/3/2002
In Re Edwards
Citations
- 808 A.2d 476
- 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 546
- 2002 WL 31357168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \commingling in itself [does] not amount to misappropriation\
- \The fact that the balance in the escrow account fell below $ 430.86 ... is without significance because the [client's] money was not deposited in that account.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Terry, Farrell, Glickman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-17· cited 33×
- In Re GreenspanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-11-09· cited 14×
- In Re EdwardsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-03-18· cited 11×
- In re RobinsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-08-22· cited 11×
- In re PyeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-12-27· cited 10×
- In Re SimsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2004-03-11· cited 9×
- In re Barry J. NaceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-09-04· cited 6×
- In re BoykinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2010-07-29· cited 6×
- In Re ZakroffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-25· cited 5×
- In re RehbergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-02-02· cited 5×
- In re Brandi NaveDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-11-29· cited 1×
- In re DaileyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-07-09
- In re SchumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-06-10
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-06· cited 255×
- In Re MicheelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-05-19· cited 106×
- In Re AndersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-08-02· cited 90×
- In Re HarrisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1983-05-26· cited 82×
- In Re PiersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-02-28· cited 63×
- In Re HesslerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-27· cited 61×
- Matter of ShillaireDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-10-25· cited 56×
- In Re BerrymanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-12-28· cited 51×
- In Re PelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1995-01-30· cited 35×
- In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-07-24· cited 32×
- In Re ChoroszejDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-30· cited 31×
- In Re MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-03-18· cited 20×
- In Re IngramDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-01-11· cited 20×
- In Re ReedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-11· cited 18×
- In Re ThompsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-08-14· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.