Skip to main content
· 11/24/2004

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Vanderbeek

Citations

  • 101 P.3d 88

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a hearing officer's finding that an attorney acted with the intent of personal gain where the attorney engaged in false billing practices
  • upholding a hearing officer’s finding that an attorney acted with the intent of personal gain where the attorney engaged in false billing practices
  • considering delay as a.mitigating circumstance where the majority of client grievances against attorney were from six.to nine years prior to .the disciplinary hearing
  • stating, \the attorney facing discipline must bring forth cases demonstrating the disproportionality of the sanction imposed\ (citing In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Kagele, 149 Wash.2d 793, 821, 72 P.3d 1067 (2003))
  • stating, “the attorney facing discipline must bring forth cases demonstrating the disproportionality of the sanction imposed” (citing In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Kagele, 149 Wn.2d 793, 821, 72 P.3d 1067 (2003))
  • this court used its plenary power under ELC 2.1 to amend a hearing officer's conclusions of law, which contained a typographical error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.