· 4/24/2003
Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Kuvara
Citations
- 66 P.3d 1057
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court would “retain the Noble factors of proportionality and degree of unanimity, but discard the remaining three as redundant due to the existence of similar provisions in the Standards and the ELC”
- hearing officer's FOF not assigned error are verities on appeal if they were adopted by the Board
- hearing officer’s FOF not assigned error are verities on appeal if they were adopted by the Board
- getting rid of several Noble factors but retaining proportionality
- discarding redundant factors of a multifactor test
- discarding redundant factors of a multifactor test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bridge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.