Skip to main content
· 2/11/2010

In Re Disciplin. Proceeding Against Cramer

Citations

  • 225 P.3d 881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to apply this mitigator because the attorney did not start paying off tax warrants until after a disciplinary hearing
  • refusing to apply this mitigator because the attorney did not start paying off tax warrants until after a disciplinary hearing
  • aggravating factors of prior discipline, bad faith obstruction of disciplinary process, substantial experience, and indifference to making restitution would justify disbarment even if not the presumptive sanction
  • aggravating factors of prior discipline, bad faith obstruction of disciplinary process, substantial experience, and indifference to making restitution would justify disbarment even if not the presumptive sanction
  • because “registering a new business with DOR is required by law,” DOR has agents “charged with locating unregistered business entities”
  • disbarment was appropriate for attorney’s criminal acts in attempting to circumvent state tax law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: C. Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.